Home | Welcome | What's New | Site Map | Glossary | Weather Doctor Amazon Store | Book Store | Accolades | Email Us

Weather People and History

Wilson Bentley,
The Snowflake Man of Vermont

Wilson Alwyn Bentley lived all his life in Jericho, Vermont, and from his farm, this largely self-educated farmer gave us the first views of the world of snowflakes. Born on 9 February 1865, Bentley’s lifetime work was farming his family’s acreage in Jericho, Vermont. But Bentley’s passion was observing snowflakes and photographing them. He also took a keen interest in all of nature as well as other aspects of the weather. From 1885 and throughout the following winters, until his death in 1931, Bentley captured over 5000 snowflakes, or more correctly, snow crystals, on film By combining a microscope with a bellows camera, Bentley became the first person to photograph a single snow crystal and he continued to do so for the next 46 years. Despite the fact he rarely left Jericho, thousands of Americans knew him as The Snowflake Man or simply Snowflake Bentley.

Our belief that “no two snowflakes are alike” stems from a line in a 1925 report in which he remarked: “Every crystal was a masterpiece of design and no one design was ever repeated. When a snowflake melted, that design was forever lost.” [Strictly speaking, what Bentley usually photographed were snow crystals rather than a snowflake, which is an aggregate of many snow crystals.]


Snow Crystal Classes

His mother Fanny Eliza, a former school teacher, gave Wilson his early education and instilled in him a love of reading and learning that remained with him his entire life. Bently would recall: “I never went to school until I was 14 years old. My mother taught me at home. She had been a school teacher before she married my father, and she instilled in me her love of knowledge and of the finer things of life. She had books, including a set of encyclopedia. I read them all.” He further recalled: “She had a small microscope which she had used in her school teaching. When the other boys of my age were playing with pop-guns and sling-shots, I was absorbed in studying things under this microscope: drops of water, tiny fragments of stone, a feather dropped from a bird's wing, a delicately veined petal from some flower.” This instrument opened the world of small to young Wilson.

The Snowflake Man

A lover of winter, Wilson made plans to use his microscope to view snowflakes. His initial investigations proved both fascinating and frustrating as he tried to observe the short-lived flakes. So that he could share his discoveries, Wilson began by sketching what he saw, accumulating several hundred sketches by his seventeenth birthday. When his father purchased a camera for his son, Wilson adapted the camera to photograph snowflakes. Marrying the microscope to the camera, he made his first successful photomicrograph of a snow crystal on 15 January 1885.

In addition to the development of the hardware, Bentley also had to devise a protocol to capture a snow crystal and transport it with minimal damage to the camera’s field of vision. What Bentley found worked best was to capture the crystals on a cool velvet-covered tray. Taking care not to melt the crystal with his breathe, he identified a suitable subject and lifted it onto a pre-cooled slide with a thin wooden splint from his mother’s broom and nudged it into place with a turkey feather. The slide was then carried into his photographic shed and placed under the microscope. The back-lit image was then focused using a system of strings and pulleys he devised to accommodate his mittened hands. Once focused, the sensitized glass plate — the “film” — was exposed and stored for further processing, development and printing.

Bentley described the process in a 1922 artlcle in Popular Mechanics Magazine (Vol. 37, pages 309-312.)

"The apparatus required for snowflake photography consists of a compound microscope, fitted with a joint that permits the instrument to be turned down horizontally, at right angles to its base, so that it can be coupled to a camera bellows by means of a light-tight connection. The microscope objectives are used alone, without the eyepiece. It is best to have several different objectives; 1/2, 3/4, and 3-in. combinations, which give magnifications of from 8 to 60 diameters (64 to 3,600 times), will serve well.
"Ordinary daylight, coming through a window, is used for illuminating the crystal after it has been placed on a microscope slide, a tiny beam of light entering through the small aperture in the substage of the instrument. The apparatus is placed indoors, near by and facing a window. The room, the apparatus, and its accessories should always be away from any source of artificial heat, and at a temperature approximately that of the outside air. The necessary accessories are an observation microscope, a pair of thick mittens, microscope slides, a sharp-pointed wooden splint, a feather, and a turkey wing or similar duster; also, an extra focusing back for the camera, containing clear glass instead of the usual ground glass, with a magnifying lens attached; this is used for final focusing. A blackboard, about 1 ft. square, with stiff wire or metal handles at the ends, so that the hands will not touch and warm it, is used to collect the specimens. As it is necessary to cover the end of the microscope objective with a strip of black card, that takes the place of the usual camera shutter which controls the duration of exposure, it is necessary to fit two vertical rods at each side of the microscope tube to hold the card.
Snow Crystals photographed by Wilson A. Bentley
"The snowflakes are caught on the blackboard as they fall, and examined by the naked eye or with the assistance of a hand magnifying glass. The feather duster is used to brush the board clean every few seconds, until two or more promising specimens alight upon it, when it is immediately removed indoors. From this point onward the photographer must work fast. The promising specimens are placed for a moment's observation under the observation microscope. The removal of the snowflake from the board to the microscope slide is accomplished with the sharp-pointed splint, which is pressed gently against the face of the crystal until the latter adheres to it, so that it can be picked up and placed on the glass slide. Usually several crystals are placed together on a single slide, a momentary glance being given to each, and care taken while doing this not to breathe on the crystals. The utmost haste must be used, for a snow crystal is often exceedingly tiny, and frequently not thicker than heavy paper. Furthermore, once these bits of pure beauty are isolated, evaporation (not melting) soon wears them away, so that, even in zero weather, they last but a very few minutes. When a desirable specimen is obtained, it is pressed flat against the glass with the edge of the feather and the slide inserted in the stage of the microscope on the camera stand, centered, roughly focused with the camera ground glass, then sharply focused with the clear-glass screen and magnifier, focusing on some tiny air tube near the center of the crystal. The plate holder is then inserted into the camera, the objective covered with the black card and the slide removed from the plate holder. The objective is then uncovered, and when the exposure, which may vary from 8 seconds to 100 or more, is deemed sufficient, the operation is reversed. Naturally enough, no rule for the length of exposure can be given, except that the greater the magnification, the longer the exposure should be.
"The frail, feathery flakes are the most difficult to photograph, and it is always best to place five or six other crystals around the specimen, as this greatly retards the evaporation of the central one."

Bentley also devised his own processing methods. In addition to developing the original image, he also created a post-development process, which enhanced the image. Since each photograph was taken of a white snow crystal against a white background, Bentley was dissatisfied with the initial photograph. He felt he could improve the contrast and enhance the detail if he presented the crystal against a dark background. To do this, he painstakingly scrapped away the dark emulsion surrounding the snow crystal image from a duplicate of the original negative using a sharp penknife and steady hand. The altered image was then carefully placed upon a clear glass plate and then printed, giving it a dark background.. Even after years of practice, this post-production process often took a long as four hours for a complex snow crystal.

With 70-75 photographs per storm and notes on the conditions under which they were collected, Bentley accrued a considerable understanding of snow. In 1897, he became acquainted with Professor George Perkins, a professor of geology at the University of Vermont, and they prepared the first paper on snow crystals published in the May 1898 issue of Appleton’s Popular Scientific entitled “A Study of Snow Crystals.”

Snow Crystals photographed by Wilson A. Bentley

Bentley's inquiring nature also wanted to know how snow crystals formed and where in the clouds they originated. He wrote in that paper: ”...by means of these wonderfully delicate and exquisite figures, much may be learned of the history of each crystal and the changes through which it has passed in its journey through cloudland.” (Popular Science Monthly, May 1898)

He also described his observations on snowflake formation in an article in Technical World (1910) titled "Snow Beauties"

"Most of the crystals are, of course, imperfect, made so especially during thick and heavy snowfalls, largely as a result of crowding and bunching during development, or to fracturing due to violent winds. In general, the western quadrants of wide spread storms furnish the majority of the more perfect tabular shapes. As a rule low clouds, if relatively warm, tend to produce the more rapidly growing open branching forms, and the inter mediate and upper clouds, if relatively much colder, the more solid, close columnar and tabular forms. Sometimes, however, crystals differing but slightly or not at all from those falling from storm clouds, drop out of apparently cloud-free skies."

The Raindrop Man

Such thinking likely led him to wonder about the formation and history of all forms of precipitation. His conversations with Professor George Henry Perkins (who co-authored Bentley's first article) at the University of Vermont must have boosted his confidence that he was doing meaningful scientific work -- not wasting his time as his father and brother frequently complained. Spending the winter fussing over snowflakes was crazy enough, but wasting valuable summer hours playing with raindrops; that was too much in their opinion.

Therefore, during a seven-year period from 1898 to 1904, Bentley's summer interest turned to rain, not the usual concern for rain of a Vermont farmer, but a particular interest in the size of raindrops. Unfortunately, the results of that research were far ahead of the contemporary thinking in atmospheric sciences and were ignored or forgotten for almost four decades. Let us turn our attention away from The Snowflake Man for a moment and focus on W.A. Bentley, The Raindrop Man, by taking a close look at his study of raindrops.

Bentley remarked that his motivation for his raindrop work came from a “desire to add, if possible, a little to our knowledge regarding rainfall phenomena.” And that he did. With as focused and thorough an effort as he exhibited with his snow crystal work, Bentley became the most diligent chaser of raindrops of his day. From his studies of rain, he gave us early insights into raindrops and their size distribution in storms.

After some experimentation, Bentley developed a simple yet effective apparatus for gathering raindrops: a shallow pan of wheat flour. At first, he simply photographed the imprints — the impact region — made by the falling rain in the flour. According to his technical notebook, titled Snow which covering the period 1989 to 1902, he first succeeded in "photographing" raindrop impressions on October 30, 1898: “I secured first photos of raindrops, magnified 4 diameters. They were impressions made in flour. After trying various mediums I found flour to be best to secure their impressions in.”

On the evening of November 10th, Bentley made one of those serendipitous discoveries that fill the annals of scientific investigation. “In the bottom of each raindrop impression in the flour there could always be found a roundish granule of dough nearly exact size of raindrop. After experimenting with artificial raindrops I could measure diameter before falling into the flour, and thus tell if the dough granule corresponded in size with the measured raindrop.”

Collection Pan
Raindrops falling into pan filled with flour
forms small dough pellets.

Bentley saw the utility of such an experimental technique (and perhaps as a good Yankee farmer the thrift of it as well). He then set out to assure himself that the dough granules related to the true raindrop size. He calibrated his device thus:

“Drops of water of about one-twelfth of an inch [2.1 mm] and one-sixth of an inch [4.2 mm] in diameter, suspended from the end of a broom splint and a glass pipette respectively, were carefully measured and then allowed to drop into flour from height of from twelve to thirty feet [3.7 to 9.1 m].”

The resulting dough pellets “were found by careful experiment to correspond very closely in size with the raindrops that made them.” Thus assured of the validity of the results, Bentley had his collection apparatus -- a shallow tin pan and a cup of well-sifted baking flour.

“The method employed was to allow the raindrops to fall into a layer one inch deep of fine, uncompacted flour, with a smooth surface, contained in a shallow tin receptacle about four inches in diameter, which was generally exposed to the rain for about four seconds, although a longer time was given when the drops fell scatteringly. The raindrops were allowed to remain in the flour until the dough pellet that each drop always produces at the bottom of the cavity was dry and hard.”

Bentley's niece Alice recalled watching him sift flour into small tin containers and then run quickly outside with them into the hard rain. “Then later on,” she remembered, “I saw these little pellets, dried, so I asked what they were, and then he'd explain the whole thing to me. He said he was trying to measure the size of raindrops. In different storms they'd be different sizes. He had these little pellets all around the table.”

Bentley measured these raindrop “fossils” and divided them into one of five size-range categories.

Pellet Size Category Diameter Range Percent of Total
(867) Drops
Very Small < 0.033 inches;
<0.85 mm
17*
Small 0.033 to 0.055 inches;
0.85 to 1.4 mm
34
Medium 0.067 to 0.125 inches;
1.7 to 3.2 mm
29
Large 0.143 to 0.200 inches;
3.6 to 5.1 mm
16
Very Large >0.200 inches;
>5.1 mm
4
* Willis Moore (Descriptive Meteorology, D. Appleton and Company, 1914) speculated that this value may be low due to smaller drops not being recovered from the flour.

Over the tenure of his raindrop studies, Bentley collected 344 sets of raindrop pellets from over 70 distinct storms, including 25 thunderstorms, to which he added meticulous weather data about the storm: date, time of day, temperature, wind, cloud type and estimated cloud height. He also noted the type of storm, the presence or absence of lightning, and what sector of the storm from which the samples were collected. Bentley concluded that different storms produce different size raindrops and different size distributions. Few rainfall events had uniform drop sizes, but when they did, he discovered, they were composed of either all small drops or all large drops. Low rain clouds produced mostly small drops. The largest drops, around a quarter inch in diameter, fell from the tall cumulonimbus clouds of thunderstorms. He concluded that the size of drops and snowflakes could tell a lot about the vertical structure of the storm.

From his study data, he concluded that drops of all sizes were usually present in most rains. However, small drops greatly outnumbered the large ones. The largest drops fell solely from cumulonimbus clouds that reached far up into the sky.

Bentley also observed that a small number of samples (7.5 %) were composed solely of one size category — usually small drops but sometimes only large ones. Such distributions are called monodisperse, and their cause is still an issue of debate today. Bentley felt these distributions were due to the melting of snow crystals or granular snow, which he had found to generally be of uniform size.

Bentley also used his data to conclude that the largest drops fell in rains associated with lightning overhead rather than flashing in the distance or being totally absent. From an analysis of nearly 80 data sets from each of the three lightning scenarios, the largest drops — those > 0.20 inches (5 mm) in diameter — were thirty times more numerous when lightning flashed overhead compared to the no-lightning situation and ten times greater in number with lightning overhead than when it was present but distant from the sampling location. Bentley believed that the large drops caused the lightning because they had a higher concentration of electrical charge than smaller drops.

Duncan C. Blanchard, long-time researcher in the field of cloud and precipitation physics as well as Bentley biographer, remarked that Bentley helped open a Pandora's Box of hypotheses on what really happens within a thunderstorm. Do the charged, large raindrops cause the lightning? Or does the lightning help form large raindrops? Although most atmospheric scientists would currently side with Bentley on this issue, “[t]his chicken-or-the-egg scenario is being played out in laboratories around the world today.”

Another of Bentley's deductions drawn from his measurements proposed that, based on the raindrop size distribution in thunderstorms, most thunderstorm rain came from the melting of snowflakes. He drew his conclusions form the relative volumes of large and small drops collected in thunderstorm rainfall.

“Assuming, accordingly, that the larger raindrops issue from the upper portions of the clouds and are due to the melting of snow, or, conversely, that the smaller ones originate by liquid processes alone within the lower clouds, we have a means of approximately ascertaining which process produces the major part of the rainfall. We have only to group together the individual raindrops (flour pellets) within the samples secured during various rainfalls, and weigh each group separately.”

Looking at the data from four thunderstorms, he found the total weight of the larger drops was almost twice that of the total weight of the smaller drops and thus concluded "the major portion of the rainfall of thundershowers is of snow origin."

Unfortunately, Bentley was so far ahead of his time that he wasn’t fully appreciated by contemporary scientists. They didn’t take this self-educated farmer seriously. It was 40 years — the study of cloud physics and precipitation processes would not blossom until the 1940s — before his raindrop work was rediscovered and corroborated. The first recognition of Bentley's raindrop experiments appears to have been by US Soil Conservation Service scientists J.O. Laws and D.A. Parsons, who published a paper in 1943 reporting measurements of raindrop size under various rainfall intensities using Bentley's collection method.

Although he dropped his study of raindrops after a few years, he continued to photograph snow crystal and speculate on the nature of snow. From his large data archive, Bentley’s analysis convinced him that the form the ice crystal took (hexagonal plate, six-sided star, hexagonal column, needle, etc) was dependent on the air temperature in which the crystal formed and fell. Nearly three decades would pass before Ukichiro Nakaya in Japan would confirm this hypothesis.

He also wanted to promote his work for its beauty, and thus submitted articles and delivered lectures that focused on his snow photography over the years. His lectures were popular, and from them he was dubbed The Snowflake Man and Snowflake Bentley by the newspapers. Over one hundred articles were published in well-known newspapers and magazines such as The Christian Herald, Popular Mechanics, National Geographic, The New York Times Magazine, and the American Annual of Photography. His best photographs were in demand from jewelers, engravers and textile makers who saw the beauty in his work. Bentley's prints and lantern slides were purchased by institutions throughout the world.

The Man

After Bentley’s father died. Wilson was left with the care of his mother, now an invalid, and running the farm, which he shared with his brother. His brother lived his wife and eight children in one half of the old farmhouse; Wilson in the other. The farm did well and they increased their dairy herd from a ten to a twenty-cow operation. He never married, and, after the death of his mother, lived alone in his side of the house. He continued to farm the acreage with his older brother for all his life.

W.A. BentleyWilson Bentley was described as introverted, sensitive, and gentle natured. He had delicate, rounded facial features and a well-groomed head of dark hair that receded with the years. He also sported a large, bushy mustache. His only dress-up suit was in desperate need of pressing but it served his purposes for many years. When working outdoors in the winter, Bentley wore a large, dark overcoat and a soft felt hat he clamped tightly to his head using a long scarf that came down over his ears and tied beneath his chin.

As a grown man, Bentley was slight of frame, likely just over five feet tall and weighing around 120 pounds, but could dig a row of potatoes or pitch hay as well as any farmer in the valley. He attributed his ability for doing such delicate photograph to his lifestyle: “I never have used liquor, tobacco, or any stimulants that affect my nerves. My hand is perfectly steady.”

Though not an outgoing man, he had a sense of humor and loved to entertain by playing the piano or violin and singing popular songs. He also played clarinet in a small brass band and could imitate the sounds of many animals. In later life, he lamented that his neighbors did not really accept what he was doing.

“Oh, I guess they've always believed I was crazy, or a fool, or both. Years ago, I thought they might feel different if they understood what I was doing. I thought they might be glad to understand. So I announced that I would give a talk in the village and show lantern slides of my pictures. They are beautiful, you know, marvelously beautiful on the screen. But when the night came for my lecture just six people were there to hear me. It was free, mind you! And it was a fine, pleasant evening, too. But they weren't interested.”

Bentley’s interest in nature stretched well beyond his snow photographs. He studied auroras and kept an extensive weather journal, entering observations three times each day which included the type and amount of low, middle, and high clouds, temperature, and precipitation. Geology also fascinated him, and he would collect rock specimens as he roamed the countryside. In hopes that his love for the beauty of nature could be conveyed to others, he contributed to the Fresh Air Fund that helped bring city children out into the countryside.

In 1924, the American Meteorological Society’s first research grant was awarded to Bentley for “40 years of extremely patient work.” The monetary value of the grant was undoubtedly small, but it gave Bentley something that meant more: recognition by the scientific community for his work.

Bentley never gained monetary wealth from his snowflake photos. He remarked in 1926: “From a practical standpoint I suppose I would be considered a failure, It has cost me $15,000 in time and materials to do the work, and I have received less than $4,000 from it.” A young lady from Brooklyn once asked for some snowflake photos, enclosing $3. He sent her sixty with a note that gives us some insight to his dedication to his work: “As usual, when good snowflakes are falling, I did not stop for dinner or anything else, tho I had callers, and became ravenously hungry.”

Bentley only occasionally left Vermont, most often to give lectures in the upper Northeast and nearby Canada. These appearances were never far from home so he could always return quickly to his work. Once, after a lecture in southern Vermont, he hastily explained to his host that he could not bear to miss the snowstorm then raging; he must leave for home on the next train.

Wilson occasionally submitted technical reports to the US Weather Bureau’s publication Monthly Weather Review. Although he received scant recognition from most scientists, he did receive encouragement from Weather Bureau chief meteorologist Dr William J. Humphreys who helped him publish a collection of his photographs. Humphreys wrote the technical introduction and appeared as co-author.

The Book and Final Days

The book Snow Crystals by W. A. Bentley and W. J. Humphrey was published by McGraw-Hill in November 1931. It contained 2500 selected snow crystal photos plus 100 of frost and dew formation. The book has since been republished by Dover Books. In late November following Thanksgiving, Bentley received three copies of the book and promptly thanked Humphreys in a note dated December 1, “…I am delighted with it.”

In early-December 1931 returning from Burlington, Wilson Bentley, ill dressed for the weather, walked six miles through a slushy snowstorm to reach his home. On December 7, he wrote in his journal “Cold north wind afternoon. Snow flying.” This was the last entry he would make after 47 years. Not long thereafter, he caught a cold, which untreated, grew into pneumonia. “Snowflake” Bentley died on 23 December at the age of 66. In March of that year, he had taken the last of his photomicrographs of snow, still using the same camera system that took the first one.

Although his father and brother thought Wilson’s snow photography a lot of nonsense and not the proper thing for a farmer to do, Wilson broke unique ground in the early days of modern meteorology as well as microscopic photography. His biographer, cloud physicist Duncan Blanchard, dubbed him “America’s First Cloud Physicist.” The Burlington Free Press wrote in a Christmas Eve obituary for Bentley:

Snow Crystals photographed by Wilson A. Bentley
“Longfellow said that genius is infinite painstaking. John Ruskin declared that genius is only a superior power of seeing. Wilson Bentley was a living example of this type of genius. He saw something in the snowflakes which other men failed to see, not because they could not see, but because they had not the patience and the understanding to look.
Truly, greatness blooms in quiet corners and flourishes under strange circumstances. For Wilson Bentley was a greater man than many a millionaire who lives in luxury of which the 'Snowflake Man' never dreamed.”

On the morning he was laid to rest in the Jericho Center cemetery, it began to snow, leaving a dusting over the burial ground. His small tombstone reads, with typical New England brevity:

Wilson
Snowflake Man

For a video on Snowflake Bentley, click on the image below.

(Snow photographs by Wilson A. Bentley, public domain.)

cover I am indebted to Duncan C. Blanchard for the extensive research on W.A. Bentley found in his biography of Bentley titled The Snowflake Man. The facets of Bentley's life presented here are based on materials from that book. I have reviewed the book in the Weather Reviews section of the Weather Doctor.



Learn More From These Relevant Books
Chosen by The Weather Doctor


Written by
Keith C. Heidorn, PhD, THE WEATHER DOCTOR,
March 1, 2011


Wilson Bentley, The Snowflake Man of Vermont ©2011, Keith C. Heidorn, PhD. All Rights Reserved.
Correspondence may be sent via email to: see@islandnet.com.

For More Weather Doctor articles, go to our Site Map.




Now Available

The Field Guide to Natural Phenomena:
The Secret World of Optical, Atmospheric and Celestial Wonders
by Keith C Heidorn, PhD and Ian Whitelaw

Available through Amazon.com and Amazon.ca

I have recently added many of my lifetime collection of photographs and art works to an on-line shop where you can purchase notecards, posters, and greeting cards, etc. of my best images.

To Purchase Notecard,
Greeting Cards and Posters
featuring my images, visit
The Weather Doctor's
Nature Gallery


In association with Zazzle.com


Order Today from Amazon!

To Order in Canada:
And Now...The Weather
by Keith C. Heidorn

Available in the US!

And Now...The Weather
by Keith C. Heidorn

To Order in Canada:
The BC Weather Book:
From the Sunshine Coast
to Storm Mountain

by Keith C. Heidorn

Now Available in the US!

The BC Weather Book:
From the Sunshine Coast
to Storm Mountain

by Keith C. Heidorn










Home | Welcome | What's New | Site Map | Glossary | Weather Doctor Amazon Store | Book Store | Accolades | Email Us
In association with Zazzle.com


Weather Doctor Bookstore